bloggerspam:

smurflewis:

2spookywendigo:

jabbaduhutt:

russian-tupperware:

aetropos:

yeahyeahno:

chicksdigthephoenix:

super-scout:

aetropos:

starexorcist:

tehmostaewsumblogevar:

starexorcist:

ecrusher:

10knotes:

M&Ms Droplets

now that’s what photography should be about… not a black and white picture of someone’s shoes

image

image

The top picture is full of M&M’s. They’re bule, red, orange, green, yellow, and brown.

image

But in the bottom picture we clearly see there’s white, pink, and even purple candies in the bowl.

image

The bottom picture is of gumballs! This concludes that the bottom picture is not taken with that camera at all. I’d even go as far to say that it was edited in photoshop with a filter!

image

image

Yes the above image and the below image are not the same photograph being taken. This is rather obvious.

image

BUT Mr. Wright there is one thing you overlooked. Examine the droplets on the bottom image. None of them are from the same angle. This is a natural occurance when looking through water droplets.

Is it not possible that the photographer took the second image first?

image

Would it not be more probable that when asked HOW it was taken he/she took the above image of their setup Using M&Ms, something much more common in a household rather than many gumballs, something they may have just bought for the original photo?

So to claim it was not taken with the same camera is indeed a long shot Mr. Wright.

image

Thank you for your time.

image

Really Edgeworth, is that you’re argument.

image

Aren’t you overlooking the fact that there are no pink M&Ms. This proves undeniably that these are not, in fact M&Ms, but some other kind of candy.

image

And one other thing, I find it highly improbable that not one piece of candy is facing so the M logo is on the candy.

image

So in conclusion, there is no way these are possibly M&Ms.

image

hey mister I think you’re confuuuuuuused. Edgeworth agreed that they weren’t M&M’s. He was just refuting that there is a possibility there wasnt any photoshop used and that the above image was only depicting the method used in the bottom image.

image

I think someone might be getting a little senile hehehe

image

image

image

image

Everyone seems to be walking around the accusations by examining whether they are or aren’t M&Ms. That is not what’s important. What we should be looking at is instead, the so-called droplets, compared to the background image.

image

image

The angles within the droplets do not realistically coincide with one another! As well, I don’t spend much time staring at drops of water, but I can surely say I’ve never seen such clarity in any water droplet. Also, as in the former picture, there is an obvious fogging on the glass, surely caused by whichever process was used to spray the water. Where is the fog?

image

On top of all that, the drops are amazingly tiny compared to the anonymous-candy. One could argue the sheet is further away than in the ‘example’ pic, but the blurring of the candies definitely objects to that. We could also try to assume that the spray method used in the ‘original’ photo caused much tinier water spots, but are we to believe that the photographer was so careless that they couldn’t recreate the correct droplet size in the ‘example’? Surely, they should have been able to cause at least a closer resemblance.

image

Sure seems like they went out of their way to showcase the methodology of how the photograph was taken, yet neglected to go far enough to ensure it could be a like-comparison?

image

image

Rather unlikely!

image

Actually, Mr. Godot!!

image

Well, according to the properties of light and the way it’s refracted…

image

image

If you mirror it the right way, they line up just fine!

image

Aah… these M&M’s droplets

image

So colourful… reminds me of the days of my youth!

image

the red ones remind me of my hemorroids… *cough*

image

image

I have found some new evidence though the original image source suggesting this second image has been tampered with!

image

This image clearly shows candies that correspond to the colours commonly found in M & M s…  The edge of the bowl is visible, as are some ‘M’ symbols, if you look closely.

image

This suggests the second image in the original is perhaps just a fabrication based off of the second.

image

Therefore…

It is clearly a fraud!

image

image

You shouldn’t jump the “fraud” gun just yet, Wright. If your source is really the corresponding photo to the first, then the “gumball” picture in question might not be at fault. To put it bluntly, it might just be a copycat.

image

To put it another way, this could just be a case of a mistaken and mismatched photoset..

image

With all the evidence provided, I think it’s safe to assume this case could be solved: The candies in the second photograph are not M&Ms, but the photo itself was not exactly tampered with. It was just a completely separate photo of separate candies, possibly just misplaced in this set by the original poster, who was completely unaware of the mismatch!

image

Hold it right there everyone.

There is..

image

A PUZZLE HIDDEN IN THAT BOWL OF MISLEADING CANDY.

I cannot, not reblog this. It is amazing!

OH. MY. FUCKING. GOD.

If I don’t reblog this assume I’m dead

i feel like all questionable photos on the internet should go through trial this way

#makethishappenplease

diseonfire:

xeiko:

ingthing:

beamkatanachronicles:

thepurpleeyedone:

beamkatanachronicles:

thepurpleeyedone:

beamkatanachronicles:

appleseeddrama:

THEY HAVE THE ACE ATTORNEY OFFICIAL MANGA IN MY LAW LIBRARY I AM CRYING.



Your honor, something is amiss here!
As you are probably aware, library materials are labeled with barcodes as well as a number to determine their location on the shelf, as per the Dewey Decimal System. The books just to the left of the manga are labeled, as are the DVDs just in view on the lower shelf. Look even further behind these shelves and you’ll see that even those books are labeled! 
Ladies and gentlemen of the courtroom, I invite you to take a closer look at the volumes that are, allegedly, part of this law library! Something is missing from the spines, isn’t there?

Where are the bar codes?!
This is a blatant contradiction! The OP is lying— these volumes cannot, therefore, be a part of this library at all! I propose that they simply brought these materials in for the sake of the joke!! 


Only focusing on one aspect and not the whole of the issue, are we, Mr. Wright? Typical.

Your honor, if you bring your attention to the books just left of the manga, you’ll notice there’s a book (the second to the left) that also does not have a bar code.

If you examine the picture even closer—particularly the DVDs below—you’ll see that they bear bar codes, but not on the spines. No, they have them on the back and/or front of the DVDs. Of course, this method of labeling and organizing isn’t limited to products of the film industry alone.

Therefore, I’d like to propose that it is entirely possible that the manga books do, in fact, belong to the library!


Wh-WHAAAAT?! You’re kidding!! 
(Shoot, he’s got me there… Better think of something fast! Something about the books that sets them apart from—
…! I’ve got it!)
While that may be true, you’ve also overlooked one critical error: the titles of the books! Whether or not your hypothesis regarding the labeling system is correct, these titles aren’t alphabetized correctly! What kind of self-respecting librarian would misplace such vital books? 
Well, Edgeworth?



While it pains me to have to point out something so obvious, I suppose I’ll make an exception for you, Wright.
Clearly, one look at the titles of the books next to the manga is a tell-all of this certain library’s less-than-stellar organization skills. None of the books are in alphabetical order, I’m afraid.

They could very well be alphabetized by author and not title, but it’s a little difficult to be able to decipher that from this single picture, wouldn’t you say?
Furthermore, the manga books themselves are in numerical order, suggesting some kind of system is in place, albeit not a very good one, if the alphabetizing is off.

At the end of the day, it seems like neither of us can draw a clear conclusion from this evidence alone. Your honor, I strongly suggest a recess in which we could investigate the library itself further.

I see the issue here very clearly.
Due to the uncertain nature of this case, we’ll have to postpone this decision until more decisive evidence can be obtained. The court will now take a 15-minute recess.

(W-wait, but I’m not—)


WAIT!!!

I’ve got some decisive evidence for you, pal!

We investigated further into the photo. Zooming in, you can see a label on the DVD case to the bottom left.

Photo Close-up added to the court record!


As you can see, pal, you can vaguely see the words “Of Toledo Law Library” on the label!

And, considering possibilities of the rest of that label, “University of Toledo" was the first to come to my mind!
A quick search on the University of Toledo’s Online Law Library Database revealed that there ARE the comics pictured in it!
Miles Edgeworth Ace Attorney Investigations volumes 1-4 and Phoenix Wright Ace Attorney volumes 1-5!

And there’s more! 
The section these comics are filed under is the “Law in Popular Culture" Section, which matches up with the stickers on the rest of the books on that shelf: "Lowering the Bar: Lawyer Jokes & Legal Culture”, “Prime Time Law”, “Lawyers in Your Living Room!" and "Reel Justice: The Courtroom Goes to the Movies”!
Not only is it in the right section, it’s also a documented part of the Law Library’s database!
How’s that for decisive evidence?


holy shit

the hell did i just witness

diseonfire:

xeiko:

ingthing:

beamkatanachronicles:

thepurpleeyedone:

beamkatanachronicles:

thepurpleeyedone:

beamkatanachronicles:

appleseeddrama:

THEY HAVE THE ACE ATTORNEY OFFICIAL MANGA IN MY LAW LIBRARY I AM CRYING.

image

image

Your honor, something is amiss here!

As you are probably aware, library materials are labeled with barcodes as well as a number to determine their location on the shelf, as per the Dewey Decimal System. The books just to the left of the manga are labeled, as are the DVDs just in view on the lower shelf. Look even further behind these shelves and you’ll see that even those books are labeled! 

Ladies and gentlemen of the courtroom, I invite you to take a closer look at the volumes that are, allegedly, part of this law library! Something is missing from the spines, isn’t there?

image

Where are the bar codes?!

This is a blatant contradiction! The OP is lying— these volumes cannot, therefore, be a part of this library at all! I propose that they simply brought these materials in for the sake of the joke!! 

Only focusing on one aspect and not the whole of the issue, are we, Mr. Wright? Typical.

Your honor, if you bring your attention to the books just left of the manga, you’ll notice there’s a book (the second to the left) that also does not have a bar code.

If you examine the picture even closer—particularly the DVDs below—you’ll see that they bear bar codes, but not on the spines. No, they have them on the back and/or front of the DVDs. Of course, this method of labeling and organizing isn’t limited to products of the film industry alone.

Therefore, I’d like to propose that it is entirely possible that the manga books do, in fact, belong to the library!

image

Wh-WHAAAAT?! You’re kidding!! 

image
(Shoot, he’s got me there… Better think of something fast! Something about the books that sets them apart from—

image
…! I’ve got it!)

While that may be true, you’ve also overlooked one critical error: the titles of the books! Whether or not your hypothesis regarding the labeling system is correct, these titles aren’t alphabetized correctly! What kind of self-respecting librarian would misplace such vital books? 

Well, Edgeworth?

While it pains me to have to point out something so obvious, I suppose I’ll make an exception for you, Wright.

Clearly, one look at the titles of the books next to the manga is a tell-all of this certain library’s less-than-stellar organization skills. None of the books are in alphabetical order, I’m afraid.

They could very well be alphabetized by author and not title, but it’s a little difficult to be able to decipher that from this single picture, wouldn’t you say?

Furthermore, the manga books themselves are in numerical order, suggesting some kind of system is in place, albeit not a very good one, if the alphabetizing is off.

At the end of the day, it seems like neither of us can draw a clear conclusion from this evidence alone. Your honor, I strongly suggest a recess in which we could investigate the library itself further.

I see the issue here very clearly.

image
Due to the uncertain nature of this case, we’ll have to postpone this decision until more decisive evidence can be obtained. The court will now take a 15-minute recess.

image

(W-wait, but I’m not—)

image

WAIT!!!

I’ve got some decisive evidence for you, pal!

We investigated further into the photo. Zooming in, you can see a label on the DVD case to the bottom left.

Photo Close-up added to the court record!

As you can see, pal, you can vaguely see the words “Of Toledo Law Library” on the label!

And, considering possibilities of the rest of that label, “University of Toledo" was the first to come to my mind!

A quick search on the University of Toledo’s Online Law Library Database revealed that there ARE the comics pictured in it!

Miles Edgeworth Ace Attorney Investigations volumes 1-4 and Phoenix Wright Ace Attorney volumes 1-5!

And there’s more! 

The section these comics are filed under is the “Law in Popular Culture" Section, which matches up with the stickers on the rest of the books on that shelf: "Lowering the Bar: Lawyer Jokes & Legal Culture”, “Prime Time Law”, “Lawyers in Your Living Room!" and "Reel Justice: The Courtroom Goes to the Movies”!

Not only is it in the right section, it’s also a documented part of the Law Library’s database!

How’s that for decisive evidence?

holy shit

the hell did i just witness

(via metalboxes)

helveticake:

i feel like all joffrey needed was to get turned into a llama for a while

(via metalboxes)

sisterofsilence:

Just to note on a thing you said there: Where do we draw a line for when something is a god? Because, truth be told, the…

Warning: completely personal opinion/s + pet peeve.

I don’t generally call anything or anyone a god, so that’s my line. I mislike the associations and implications the word has in modern usage. It comes with so many assumptions (and prejudices); it has no unambiguous meaning - it’s different for everyone. He voices this as one of the reasons He doesn’t want to be called a god; He doesn’t want people to forget He’s a person. With intentions. And flaws. And fails. He’s a powerful psyker, whose abilities are so out of this world to the average Joe that He might seem ‘godly’ but… He’s just a person. Who happens to be able to do incredible things. The fact that He can still, or even more so, do so after His not!Death transition into the Warp, doesn’t change that for me. Deification, to me, always feels as if the will, intent and goodness of a person is taken and then turned into something preordained, something that simply is, removing all their effort. I have similar feelings when people dust off someone’s work by saying ‘oh s/he has talent’; as if we didn’t practise, didn’t work, just shake it out of our sleeve? And that just… I don’t know, I just don’t like it. It diminishes the accomplishment. I feel the same about deification.

It’s probably fruitful to comment here that I am a big fan of Jesus and, especially, the ‘do onto others as you’d wish them do onto you’ part and not so much the whole God-business that comes along for free with it. I simply prefer humans to aspire to be like, to take heart from and to confide in. A person, just like me. A person with problems and flaws, that was able to do great anyway. God/s are just… I don’t know, I can’t relate to the idea of god/s, and this probably heavily colours my mislike of the Emperor being treated so. Twice more because it’s His lingo to not want to be called a god. And then people do it anyway. Which rubs a bunch of other issues for me too, imaginary person or not. If someone tells you not to do the thing to them, you do not do the thing to them.

TL;DR: I prefer Him as a person, a person just like me. A person with problems and flaws that did great things anyway. And shunting Him off into preordained just-happened-to-have-the-skills godhood just rubs me the wrong way. Ergo, them insisting on treating Him as that other Him, doesn’t help in me liking the Sisters of Battle. Bonus points for a lot of people doing it offensively / inaccurately on top of that.

PS. If you wonder why I capitalise His pronouns (aside from it being easier to see whom I am talking about due to a lack of a name / in favour of 10.000 times using the word Emperor), it’s because Dutch capitalises the addresses of their royalty.

barebackinq:

burritobat:

samshairisobviouslymagical:

barebackinq:

cumber-collectable:

barebackinq:

petal-winters:

barebackinq:

The girl who was my elementary school girl friend just got engaged and I’m sitting here single wearing a pug shirt and hamburger underwear

Just remember, u r someone’s dream girl

I’m a boy

Tumblr has made us forget that some people are actually straight

I’m gay

jesus this post is one train wreck after another

My great grandpa got hit by a train once.

image

(via iylish)

Album Art

froth:

duosion:

A Cruel Angel’s Thesis a cappella

I think I just had a religious experience

(via starcunning)

mildlyamused:

ironychan:

penandpage:

39cliffsidedrive:

Actual 3-year-old Tony Stark, everyone. 

I WAS JUST LOOKING FOR THIS LAST NIGHT AND COULDN’T FIND IT.

omg look at these dorks

(via proto-eevee)

It strikes me that probably the most difficult part of being a primarch is that everything is always your fault.  You grow up being able to do things nobody else can do, to accomplish goals deemed impossible for mere mortals, but that makes you responsible for everything that you don’t do.

I think that’s why the interex incident had such a powerful effect on Horus.  Somebody he had no reason to distrust betrayed him, the whole thing went ploin-shaped, and he was left wondering what he did wrong to make it all fall apart like that.

The answer, of course, is that it wasn’t his fault.  But that would imply that he wasn’t in control of the situation.

For a primarch, that’s unacceptable.

call-me-c-t:

the-meta:

a-daks:

From one to airbrushing an old pair of jeans to look like halo armor, how much of a fucking nerd are you

Gotta do a proper photoshoot and this shit is going up for custom orders. B)

YOU CAN DO THAT?!

That is fucking awesome

(via metalboxes)